MTFP photo by Hunter Pauli
Opponents of the Keystone XL oil pipeline gathered at Riverside Park in Great Falls on Wednesday.
Opponents of the Keystone XL oil pipeline gathered at Riverside Park in Great Falls on Wednesday in support of environmental and indigenous justice groups suing the U.S. government in federal court to stop the pipeline.
The lawsuit, combined by U.S. District Judge Brian Morris from two similar suits, claims the U.S. Department of State and the Bureau of Land Management violated federal environmental laws when the Trump administration resurrected Keystone XL in January 2017. Former President Barack Obama in 2015 denied Canadian company TransCanada a permit to build the pipeline over environmental concerns.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit — including the Northern Plains Resource Council, the Billings-based group that organized Wednesday’s rally — are asking the court to revoke crucial permits the State Department and the BLM granted TransCanada until the company files an updated environmental impact statement. The most recent EIS is from 2014.
In addition to the climate change and wildlife concerns the plaintiffs outline in the lawsuit, opponents say Keystone XL’s proposed crossing of the Milk, Missouri and Yellowstone rivers would threaten drinking water for tens of thousands of farmers, ranchers and tribal members in remote northeast Montana should the pipeline leak.
“There’s only two types of pipelines, the ones that are leaking and the ones that are going to leak,” said Dena Hoff, a Glendive farmer on the Yellowstone River, an NPRC member and a plaintiff in the lawsuit.
In January 2015, Hoff returned home from a weekend in Billings to see emergency lights strobing below her sheep pasture. Hoff said she had heard an ice jam caused an oil spill, and at that point she knew exactly where the Bridger Pipeline had ruptured. According to Hoff, tap water throughout Glendive smelled like diesel fuel, and, Hoff said, residents were potentially exposed to carcinogenic benzene for four days until the Environmental Protection Agency realized the town’s water intake on the Yellowstone River had been contaminated, and shut it down.
“They’ve destroyed North Dakota as far as I’m concerned,” she said, “At least somebody got rich.”
According to the current proposal, the Keystone XL would cross the Yellowstone River 13 miles upstream of Hoff’s farm. Hoff said she’s confident the law is on the plaintiff’s side, but that “there’s no accounting for the forces of corruption.”
When the Bridger Pipeline broke in 2015, it was the final straw for the Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation in Montana’s northeast corner. The region’s aquifer was contaminated by carcinogenic compounds and saline during 20th century oil booms that saw little economic benefit to the tribes.
MTFP photo by Hunter Pauli
Bill Whitehead, chairman of the Assiniboine Sioux Rural Water Supply System board, spoke at the protest gathering Wednesday in Greta Falls.
Some residents were forced for decades to drink bottled water. In 2000, Congress appropriated $300 million for the Assiniboine Sioux Rural Water Supply System to supply the reservation and nearby white communities with drinkable water from an intake plant on the Missouri River, which marks the reservation’s southern border.
The system was operational across the region by 2015. When the Tribal Executive Board saw what happened to Glendive’s drinking water, it passed a resolution opposing the Keystone XL pipeline, which crosses the Missouri upstream of the ASRWSS intake plant just west of the reservation’s Milk River border and right below the spillway for the Fort Peck Dam, which holds back the fifth largest reservoir in America.
Northern Plains testified before the Montana Land Board in 2012 that flooding the previous spring had scoured the riverbed right where Keystone XL is to be buried, but the board, led by then-Gov. Brian Schweitzer and four other Democrats, voted 5-0 to grant TransCanada right-of-way on state lands.
The Fort Peck Tribes have not joined the lawsuit against the federal government, but Bill Whitehead, chairman of the water system board, spoke out against the pipeline and its threats to the Tribes’ water at Wednesday’s rally. Whitehead said the water intake plant was never designed to filter out the tar sands crude oil that Keystone XL will carry.
“It would ruin the entire system,” he said. “We’d have to evacuate if something happened there.”
After speeches from Hoss, Whitehead and other plaintiffs in the lawsuit, about 30 people holding signs and shouting slogans marched along the Missouri River toward the River’s Edge Trail pedestrian bridge leading to the federal courthouse on the river’s west bank. Half a dozen vocal teens spontaneously joined the procession as it passed a skatepark. Beyond a handful of other teens who briefly shouted “Trump” at the marchers as they crossed the bridge, there were no counter-protesters.
Visible a mile downriver from the bridge sits the Calumet Specialty Products Partners oil refinery, where in 2016 a $450 million investment — the largest in Cascade County’s history — doubled its crude oil output and enabled the processing of the same Alberta tar sands Keystone XL is slated to transport.
From Calumet, trains of oil tanker cars roll up the Missouri’s far bank to the BNSF railyard on the south side of the bridge, and onward to terminals on the West and Gulf coasts. The danger posed by these “bomb trains” is one of the few things environmental groups and pipeline companies agree on, though while TransCanada touts Keystone XL as a safer and necessary alternative, the Natural Resources Defense Council (one of the plaintiffs suing the State Department) says tar sands are dangerous no matter what.
Hunter Pauli is a freelance reporter based out of Missoula. He has reported for the Montana Standard in Butte, the Missoula Independent and the Montana Native News Project. This article was originally published on the Montana Free Press.
